Return-Path: <shcooley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD951B28AA;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id pYoNBRGyzg3u; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352B31B27B9;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=821; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
 t=1403893531; x=1405103131;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:
 content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=HCK3WUrPsWVcER5Jj4BlpZD+GQlvJ9APjLSyZpWvQo8=;
 b=TvbErzZmM43SYa9E5V7ew7jCGLL5WqWIpq9cCNimLuDaF6QUc6E8oUyf
 niSynUrlcv2F21YFYTi0gR68+49rlW7yA1thMQcbQqzCfEP+1aUMOXqb2
 +44ySfgCrDhb8UkXyXgawcr9DtCaX8ro5xHKtr5gmbr/aGL3d6UVVglGz g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqgFAJO2rVOtJV2U/2dsb2JhbABagw2BLKo+AQEBAQEBBQFtAZkCAYENFnWEBQEEeRIBKlYmAQQBDQ2IOsNHF4VkiD8RAR8xgzSBFgEEjgGgV4NCgXc5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,562,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="56530045"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148])
 by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2014 18:25:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89])
 by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5RIPUXQ029549
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.5.38]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com
 ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:25:30 -0500
From: "Shaun Cooley (shcooley)" <shcooley@cisco.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate
Thread-Index: Ac+SNLXgaJ1IgESXR/mrYhXBOpOkGA==
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:29 +0000
Message-ID: <187A7B1DA239514F9146FC78B19AADE322D5E076@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.19.187.25]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/VS3AGjhQBPTcecYnfhzf-gwnc7k
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate.all@tools.ietf.org"
 <draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>,
 <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>,
 <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:32 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing=
 effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These co=
mments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area director=
s.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like an=
y other last call comments.

This document defines a new test command for the Sieve email filtering lang=
uage that allows for the detection of duplicate emails, as identified by me=
ssage ID, or more complex string matching in the headers or other parts of =
the message.

The document is easy to understand and covers the primary potential issue o=
f resource exhaustion that might arise from a flood of messages with unique=
 IDs.  I consider this document to be READY for publication.

-Shaun

