[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03

Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 August 2015 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBBA1B3C64; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9MJlwlwrZmC; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAA51B3C53; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbfr1 with SMTP id fr1so24092244obb.1; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; bh=vXP+BA6VhwISYH9YgpOOSswNB35cpQUuwuwNK8Eu+tI=; b=aBvvLdsECcshR5EgvNs+cM/UFa+Ea/Qfuo/ekLFsne05cckt3FDEzN/5EQ3gCnL0Vr tOYfGwK9tiP8jbtBrHysa2e7LUliI7lNc1pLr3I0uU4v0a6unxn/4XYOd5ShzRA03nN+ lA2K3qoWINsTI+c0mQKgVtpAtA8Sgiw0+xEVn320nuuewFd2Em8o0+8zkidHA0BPkd6i 9g4kjmB9wXN608FMwhQNbORevepFDw8TPpsH5gVNgAXDstgC46sz4jJ1EYtCVCtCfijZ P+BgFEzU8/R9QSmmFTaYql649sPqTsIvrFtvyt7fkv2HCCb46VbR5fuHU0hV4uOK5ocl mSqQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.20.141 with SMTP id n13mr2862396obe.26.1438881477377; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Chriss-MacBook-Air.local ([129.7.0.83]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id pn16sm4189313oeb.16.2015.08.06.10.17.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55C396C4.6020902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:17:56 -0500
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040402090908040108030000"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Wq-KYrB1030ONiANa7GHWfWcFx8>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:17:59 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

It appears that the Security Considerations Section from this document 
has been copied from RFC 2680. This appears to be appropriate for this 
document.

The document appears to be well written and thorough. I can find no 
other security concerns in it.

Best regards,
Chris