[secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
"Waltermire, David A." <david.waltermire@nist.gov> Tue, 11 June 2013 18:54 UTC
Return-Path: <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C04421F992A; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.439, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lI9pGgDPck39; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [129.6.13.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9AF21F9811; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.19) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:54:06 -0400
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov ([129.6.18.19]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:54:31 -0400
From: "Waltermire, David A." <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:54:30 -0400
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
Thread-Index: Ac5m0xncB9thc7fdRLyKE6dmlK6umw==
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6D@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6DMBCLUSTERxcha_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:54:39 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft, a proposed update to RFC 2050, documents current policies and processes used in the Internet Numbers Registry System for the assignment of the Internet Protocol (IP) address space and autonomous system (AS) numbers. It does not propose any changes to the Internet Numbers Registry System. After reviewing this informational document I do not have any security-related concerns. Sincerely, Dave Waltermire
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bi… Waltermire, David A.
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc20… Russ Housley
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc20… Jari Arkko