[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec-13

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 13 May 2024 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0500C1CAF3B; Mon, 13 May 2024 12:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171562836564.53768.7600370292370089753@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 12:26:05 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: K3ZPQSYDXSD35YMLAT4XKLDI7MPHUGD7
X-Message-ID-Hash: K3ZPQSYDXSD35YMLAT4XKLDI7MPHUGD7
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec-13
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/YPScptS8zGMg5E4sxSuwtY-aavA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Ready

With my limited knowledge of this subject area, I don't see anything that needs
comment: the document looks ready to me, and the Security Considerations appear
correct in that I don't see anything security-related that this TLV adds.