[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 18 June 2020 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBD83A0F65; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159251281326.28009.2445308597820373796@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:40:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/YikKk79xylKrQ9M_tjDc0PoemMQ>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:40:14 -0000
Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Has Nits I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2020-06-18 IETF LC End Date: 2020-07-02 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Has Nits Major Concerns: None. Minor Concerns: Section 3.4 includes: V6ONLY_WAIT The minimum time the client SHOULD stop the DHCPv4 configuration process for. MUST be no less than MIN_V6ONLY_WAIT seconds. Default: 1800 seconds The second sentence should include a subject; and "MUST NOT" seems like a better wording to me. I suggest: V6ONLY_WAIT The minimum time for which the client SHOULD stop the DHCPv4 configuration process. The value MUST NOT be less than MIN_V6ONLY_WAIT seconds. Default: 1800 seconds. Nits: Section 2: s/seems only natural/seems natural/ Section 3.3.1: s/for V6ONLY_WAIT second/for V6ONLY_WAIT seconds/
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dh… Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] [dhcwg] Secdir last call review of d… Jen Linkova
- Re: [secdir] [dhcwg] Secdir last call review of d… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)