Re: [secdir] Fwd: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 30 January 2013 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558DF21F87F5 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dv3PpAsrmwCh for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4117121F87AA for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j4so715088bkw.3 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dudy863wOL19pgxJd9FSpEUKle7RINr6353d1R+isL0=; b=ASs6bCAEAXP4/amuOt7azwBx42fXRUFVzutbJqkCBpzmPoIY20TIhe0bU4h3qKFH8j Ml7qw7oSP7leras7b/s8YL1wGpbcKOgQr+qVvWJW2m4swpLIEXjDVbhXNwhUoi7PIL0O 6k5OnNeW3OQwitprAu+QBFs9jMi5FUoG3cQkgfW4k2D28RVDJef4Q+TFNDbUTl3d3Zua kwEFXV6YRxJD2YXgDkPYYB6Kzs9QiAYVuRXFNbtT2hidSKoX5lOyXTfDmzhnXenMImUm 6G3Qtzka5ofrfQfRpn6uMf2u12t/2Q5xB1eM21d9d+tTowOKnuMlQb47HgUcXghYsDKh AKLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dudy863wOL19pgxJd9FSpEUKle7RINr6353d1R+isL0=; b=ifIp3K7jqMic74UqklvjjZZ33KoxcUdz1x6mbFJtxO4Ptxtih/ZuqWVg4i/mdJFCwy 1yALMudTYay6vwTYHo8nabQ0dpN76t3t2D6kYXG6sHO+BD/uRsyqbXD19glk7O696ron Mmhm+GlyXR+QjeguRgHFx/9CNTFfc3XDuQiYEdbSmiOFdql3m1XwP4IWnu9ONnedUaFP p5E3stRWt7K8ApFqCTil/7S9aStF/M9NnkK8Hmd8pVpVbyZJyRVOxgg9yWvbSaSGBhZs 5+5xszvZ5zQUsl4xQ16VCmjFlsm+aaSZRdPdq6/f+YF3qxbD78v/wNmDEv1Q1DMxfaPC wxcQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.12.3 with SMTP id v3mr1090335bkv.10.1359540009074; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.38.198 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <510869C4.9060706@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <003e01cdfe4a$6af134c0$40d39e40$@olddog.co.uk> <510869C4.9060706@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:00:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SSB9TFtKZVTjD3RXCYi5teno0rCT8R1T9fdywKA-w1FxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUBVkStifku92PSKVmjGwCbx5ZlCR8++fpBfKRNxqXV09GT6/SGTIbQ8G6jR82VEWBnv6aSccnhLEn3cnn0oibKoLf8TZ50z+OYVtJPAcg627miSG4abrF9L+fl0LnqTfamJoBLjZigpDW45wU9JL/RHWByxRquqHK1eDNnR7/Z+rE7GJc/JCvLgcSGDsOq9bbhh23
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Fwd: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:00:11 -0000

On 30 January 2013 00:31, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The roll folks are looking for a review of this I-D.
> If someone feels the love, can you let Tero know and
> he'll capture that. If nobody does, then Tero, can
> you pick whoever's next in the rotation.

Do you mean https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-roll-applicability-template/?include_text=1?
There doesn't appear to be a draft-ietf-

If so, there's no info in it to base a security review on.

>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0000
> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <turners@ieca.com>
> CC: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>ie>, <roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
>
> Copying Sean in just in case he is inclined to say something.
>
> A
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mcr@sandelman.ca [mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca] On Behalf Of Michael
>> Richardson
>> Sent: 27 January 2013 20:46
>> To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
>> Cc: Adrian Farrel; jpv@cisco.com
>> Subject: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
>>
>>
>> I'm still looking for SEC Directorate review of the ROLL applicability
>> template.
>>
>> The idea is to make sure that security question will get addressed
>> earlier in the process, rather than at SEC Directorate review time.
>>
>> --
>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
>> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview