IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-04

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 31 May 2010 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9740A3A68BE for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHHkoAvHfrBs for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17BE3A6826 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [213.197.167.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C4320394; Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id E42C540AB; Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350CCEB21B3E@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> (Manav Bhatia's message of "Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 +0530")
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 03:36:10 -0400
Message-ID: <tslwrukr09h.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <20100520172310.GQ9605@oracle.com> <tsl632918s3.fsf@mit.edu> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350CCEB21839@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <tsl7hmozwzn.fsf@mit.edu> <tsl1vcwxibu.fsf@mit.edu> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350CCEB21B3E@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "jjaeggli@checkpoint.com" <jjaeggli@checkpoint.com>, "shares@nexthop.com" <shares@nexthop.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "vishwas@ipinfusion.com" <vishwas@ipinfusion.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:08:28 -0000

>>>>> "Bhatia," == Bhatia, Manav (Manav) <manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com> writes:

    Bhatia,> I am aware of some implementations that look at the IP
    Bhatia,> header to determine the source. I think it's a very good
    Bhatia,> catch and we could append the following before the original
    Bhatia,> text: "In some OSPF implementations neighbors on broadcast
    Bhatia,> .. "

    Bhatia,> Does this sound acceptable?

Yes.  I'd still add a citation to the old draft, but I think that your
text change brings things nicely into alignment.  Then, in KARP, we can
figure out what we recommend about this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email