Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 06 July 2020 20:33 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EC23A0ACB; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OCS7zR_ylAET; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351853A0AC1; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 066KXDR0031822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:33:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:33:12 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Liang Xia <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200706203312.GR16335@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <159045449615.13336.5105636835437605086@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <159045449615.13336.5105636835437605086@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Zas0eO4_Fz6acHDCXaB6e8xumC0>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 20:33:32 -0000
Hi Frank, Thanks for the review. I agree that what's presented in the document is pretty straightforward and without direct security issues, however, I chose to try to broaden the scope of the document slightly, balloting Discuss to suggest adding a requirement that (when writing new protocols) the ACKs used as input for RTO algorithms be unspoofable from off-path (i.e., have enough entropy to be unguessable). That kind of scope expansion is probably outside the scope (pun intended) of a typical secdir review, though :) Thanks, Ben On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:54:56PM -0700, Liang Xia via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Liang Xia > Review result: Ready > > This document is good written, and no new security issues as it's a network > mechanism requirements BCP document. > > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > secdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tc… Liang Xia via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk