[secdir] Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 22 April 2025 16:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AC61F7A836 for <secdir@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmhhqA6rJFTO for <secdir@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954BE1F7A82E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FE5C208A6; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 0FE5C208A6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1745339523; bh=f2lWVIxNSr9fmg2RK8wk0nSNW9z/awMDDYHvmKrSz1M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=L7JsrlMb8Igxt/hiRHJqnl7AVjKo9r9cy81+WwT4kpGOjsRa+Opjo7BDce/9YJx3d L55yiWY+ItD2JLNuPmFvAZSp6DowSpBFqUhZSlw8ySG7Ibr9eBVA68zrRzvFKVgJzg iWUcUfAahTVvW7EF5ABm8joYmMaXXgELQSQUl8aA=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Magnus Nyström via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <174482152760.1487869.12653767966782787610@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg> ("Magnus Nyström via Datatracker"'s message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:38:47 -0700")
References: <174482152760.1487869.12653767966782787610@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:32:02 -0700
Message-ID: <ybl1ptk6ttp.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: FJP6BTY5UITSYHRLP5TUJYUQFNKEGXFH
X-Message-ID-Hash: FJP6BTY5UITSYHRLP5TUJYUQFNKEGXFH
X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: secdir@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ZiaZYrxEhzRCYMfeN0BzW_wzcYk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Magnus Nyström via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes: > The new statement is clearly better, but I still feel that the "and ideally > slowly when possible" part is needless and potentially confusing. [...] > So, while I would rather not include that sentence ending, it is no > longer an issue for me. Thanks Magnus. I suspect we should leave the text as at the moment as we have spent a fair amount of time on it and it's what the WG expressed as a sentiment as distilled as we can get. IE, it's the middle ground we can all live with. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dns… Magnus Nyström via Datatracker
- [secdir] Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Wes Hardaker