IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FC2124D6C; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQ3MpZosngIo; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646B91242F5; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u12so194959389qth.0; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=o9L2u8PeifLTF+dczkSozc7o+yJLe1c8DFS3ZdmfNsQ=; b=kkwKR1X0JIqPrC96Mr3V7skQ3eWYl4YJFJd6yCHl5wCPXC+thtKRmgQl/G6V72w49E TxNFfKc/Q2zLONz3iLMSL52iMfW9UpD3ZQE9jUyZ1I11eLjZhbd2i74WF8d4q1gLD5oq kIv/KiXshFGachY1e0Hidd+9l1nmX+FW9fO+Y/76amW6nr3U7cV+SiKaEBKk1IApanbi qgXPNoEFHaXgYiaOnfPB1xBx7Ie0m8FiTnObCOv0Nc+UB6F5/waB5c0ANS8az1G0bNfA 1WsKg0ldwnHUULsUlUkmVrPKOkJqPMUEsfmiQms/5nPCWgVbbpB0SXCzp5c9/AfVPJ+f md9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o9L2u8PeifLTF+dczkSozc7o+yJLe1c8DFS3ZdmfNsQ=; b=TWXRqvkEoGgwIM7A6hgfHgp4nFHE2wh63E39O68JdNi81zdLa//adVtQkuAa/fwy+o pn4nsmgCIS6qHds1JZQS/x1m0IHdzvX2rOQcDjjwhYQvCY8qxo5bFCFSZHz0hAhYHssP IJufhpCvFLLqOXWJd0DIM08+PXAQ0x+gBB1Fifebr/B2kA5Go4PrH1aD6KRiquA39uf5 AF2mdqa/KYWxdWYOk2ckyZJNzy3W6ea244EBfr3uto/HkNFaXHs2dZfJWlxoWUFxIbPX 0VyJJai8GetiJ1QHmjlgZnyjPyvWtJnqbStMIyNE1xQdFSSK1iNDY6AV42ipn528SbZS zCbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOy9E53/cHli/21YCtiu/KA0Vo7DiqqlxMi8M7kzUJXBl9R1nYFk 5+ABBkCjvC14ocN4Ngjy+S/kfFazLw==
X-Received: by 10.237.42.228 with SMTP id t91mr4380297qtd.197.1497409073515; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.19.200 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-f4-+VzZD++bKS1-+ZyWzByuTE9tjncwnV_2Mhj4JucoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwh+E+BsATQmmX6ccJou-sz1XNtFHxQZikohYCeT0qkfdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fsJ1UinNiW2LitxVQT4M1YqnFF+1cygU132=bQNgiUnA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jd+6gN2H0QWC+dM-e3pb1gUJKLE7=8PPpprGGKBQZhueg@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cnd0L2o2Db6OA1Uvp-C+geA+Ju-7E8Yo=OKS1V3P4G8sA@mail.gmail.com> <20170605165254.GE2903@localhost> <CADaq8jcOD8eodG6-jguvy3xytMkAwBhmWUTxF-eXhjxZGymXGA@mail.gmail.com> <20170606160032.GC3432@localhost> <CAKKJt-f4-+VzZD++bKS1-+ZyWzByuTE9tjncwnV_2Mhj4JucoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:57:52 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 03y6tAS1Onhjdpcl3_10Fx1plt8
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwiFruUXbnUnLexuJUnD_psYt1D_FGg9_zHJOzSB3CK0jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_AUQrlWB9mKp-gwzyOg-I6OibDk>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:57:55 -0000

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
<spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>  The document is approved. We now approve documents with no Discuss ballot
> positions, but can still make changes to resolve comments that arise during
> IESG Evaluation, if that's appropriate.
>
> I read Phillip's SECDIR review with interest. It does not seem to apply to
> this draft, any more than to the rest of NFSv4, so I wouldn't hold up this
> draft to pursue the issues Phillip raised.
>
> Those issues do seem to be a useful input to NFSv4, as the working group
> considers a charter update (after finishing quite a lot of work, and thanks
> to you all for that).

That was the sense in which it was written. Its like when you take the
car in to get the tires changed and they mention it has no brakes.
Different things, yes. But something I am going to point out.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email