Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84F112D0CC; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYmuOpPp-Igl; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5E412D532; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,483,1459839600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="121286875"
Received: from hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.38]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2016 05:39:24 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:39:21 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::837:3f3:c8b1:8d6f%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:39:21 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
Thread-Index: AdG7IyLdVBROrcWPQpmXcgE5pcjURQNrNASA
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:39:21 +0000
Message-ID: <73CCA28B-9857-46E0-A338-A19F2EE4EEDB@netapp.com>
References: <009201d1bb24$1563e4e0$402baea0$@nict.go.jp>
In-Reply-To: <009201d1bb24$1563e4e0$402baea0$@nict.go.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.36]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9606CB93-2407-4047-80A6-4F489318439C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_EU4BH9av4FpxpGEzWgiZ4LIjdM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:44:38 -0000

Hi,

thanks for the review! I'll incorporate respective changes into -14.

On 2016-05-31, at 12:06, Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> wrote:
> In Table 1 "Summary of recommendations", I wonder if the corresponding
> section numbers are correct.
> 
> [Now]
> "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1
> and
> "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to
> Section 5.2
> 
> [New]
> "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1.1
> and
> "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to
> Section 5.1.2
> 
> I might be wrong, so please check.

You were right that what we had was wrong (copy/paste bug, I think), but they pointers should be to Sections 5.1.2 and 6, respectively.

> Also I have seen several typos (especially, missing parentheses around
> referenced section numbers) on this document, so please revise the texts
> before the publication of this document.

No typos come up when using "idnits --spellcheck". I also don't quite understand what you mean by "missing parentheses around referenced section numbers" - could you please clarify?

Thanks,
Lars