Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-03

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com> Thu, 15 April 2010 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F9A3A6B2E; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, FAKE_REPLY_C=2.012, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vp8KWKIZR764; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com (rcsinet12.oracle.com [148.87.113.124]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB70228C2B5; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcsinet13.oracle.com (rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125]) by rcsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id o3FHN9YJ029419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:10 GMT
Received: from acsmt353.oracle.com (acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153]) by rcsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o3FHN3il018759; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:03 GMT
Received: from abhmt003.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 178949631271352182; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:23:02 -0700
Received: from Sun.COM (/129.153.128.104) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:23:01 -0700
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:22:57 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20100415172256.GW10389@Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-03-02)
X-Source-IP: acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4BC74B7D.001B:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0
Cc: brian@innovationslab.net
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:24:55 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document is aiming for the Standards Track.  It defines a pair of
RPSL attibutes for advertising IP addresses in a route's address block
that can be used for diagnostics via ping, traceroute.

The document lacks the normally-required security considerations
section.  However, I see no security considerations whatever in this
document.

Nico
--