Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11

[Carl Wallace <[e-mail]>]

>
>
>
>The intent was that the overload condition has granularity. That is, the
>overloaded node indicates an overload condition with some granularity,
>and later ends it. The act of ending doesn't change the granularity. We
>don't have an explicit requirement to be able to change the granularity
>of an existing condition. (Although we do not prevent a solution from
>offering that ability--but I suspect if the solution did that, it would
>involve multiple concurrent overload conditions, or ending one condition
>and starting another.)

Got it.  Thanks.