[secdir] secdir review: draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se> Thu, 02 June 2011 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@kth.se>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6105E0793; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xz7d+I7tuzmn; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se (smtp-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2622E06A2; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A25156B2D; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:00:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se
Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se ([130.237.32.175]) by mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EtLTnMjR0r4X; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:00:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EXHUB1.ug.kth.se (exhub1.ug.kth.se [130.237.32.134]) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF201558BF; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:00:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EXDB1.ug.kth.se ([169.254.1.223]) by EXHUB1.ug.kth.se ([130.237.32.134]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:00:00 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@kth.se>
To: IESG - <iesg@ietf.org>, Security-Directorat Directorat <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: secdir review: draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour
Thread-Index: AQHMINEpoosUJxHqnEChhMKfKazHjA==
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 03:00:00 +0000
Message-ID: <54F97A19-BB15-43A6-8384-B42E52893B4A@kth.se>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [99.52.202.108]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-3-111400453"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "secdir-secretary@mit.edu" <secdir-secretary@mit.edu>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review: draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:01:31 -0000

All,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I don't se any problems with the draft and find the security consideration,
while short, I agree with it.

Love