Re: [secdir] New boilerplate for reviews

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 10 December 2014 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70EA1A6FFA for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 03:22:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gh3K-BhdZ0QK for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 03:22:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BA91A1A1E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 03:22:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1418210553; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=CEuQfy+IfTPjY8pk5LIM0oUWys4N4XKz0ypAs6jyFUg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=NfREqQCo2T1rg2O3Fq0lw4Kkoj04he1XM/LHYihF2paJ/rl4r3ugitBYqqnpgWSAd4JKyS aMtrqi/2xqyWEkzoaoy4oPUR6hdphGE5OeMEnhIkIXqDGCVlvbe3+C4X5r4DZF6z+bLxHe TjaJUz44bgvx7qB64RR6v2F+MAI0i9E=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VIgs-AB3uxc=@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:22:32 +0000
Message-ID: <54882CF2.2020809@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:22:26 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <CAHbuEH7wMVfao4CmrQHvesyF6+an5eDkucMXYWo+=v=3YSf8cA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7wMVfao4CmrQHvesyF6+an5eDkucMXYWo+=v=3YSf8cA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_oQjZ5N4OnuNFLy9GTh6LTkVsfM
Subject: Re: [secdir] New boilerplate for reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:22:36 -0000

On 09/12/2014 18:52, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Stephen & I worked on an alternate boilerplate for reviews per request
> from several ADs as editors are a bit confused with the current text.
> They are not sure what to do with the reviews.  Ideally, we'd like
> them to address your comments during last call and then Stephen & I
> can pick up points that were not adequately addressed.
>
> Here is a proposal for alternate text, let us know what you think:
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving
> security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts.  Comments
> not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
> IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
I think this better reflects reality, so I am supportive of the new 
boilerplate.