Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 23:43 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7901296A8; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crCOzDrcwatp; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB29D129353; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i34so49427719qtc.0; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XY6gqnWhTn9qsReIXslK7UK7sTSpxq4gnLVh5Zc6RyQ=; b=IXs8Tx0ub7UK0OB4YITtr333HwVVBQe3GylXLSEVj1PwjvwzjBP4yPJWycYN6XgyiV 0Dux0NuZLw8YKlmqTTQhcyr1B+lKR0j+UCDWA+5oumOOhCHnhFCOACUhHrL48zKMFX/C MDVfJRYQLbepcXP5Q0ixOZVsnjU+uMNNzIsxOdzo/LLUXqqxqHDF4hhKXqRqcRhJ9XFp nG7ezmuHbG7oDFhpaEwPIpIjY+vKDjyL3Rd0Sjx0tEdL67Y3qOi9D45ibQR82j45SP5l UYZAXnzr7fk0dIwQ66jcqFiSKwCY5nG87HMlTwwvLd5/UApEr00tmM9tQDTLsnGOy7RB J2cA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XY6gqnWhTn9qsReIXslK7UK7sTSpxq4gnLVh5Zc6RyQ=; b=BDtmZi1F0N3528KOtvT+EfMAuOH1ErlzhX9ZdqtZUWn77b0oAE7U6te0++FFdJmLE7 KHUZEguSdYUdOcpQxO/2YVm2bY/adyiHlaNSXY63p6sajXpHLINTm2qkGzIAiLMOizh1 VHG9rp1TELy9F6B107rskp9KE3Y0mPuRkO5MJ39eT+xfUUzLVC9XlUCsemcXek+qAvZi MshnZh1xjuktJ1iDnQm91dn0BqFLzzTfVHcHyzxIIoWptKQOEQ60H3LqUEarnq3Zq374 tvk485vb+2qw1hjYN7BkKfyRyjPdimdSM3jSfQaHbPEp08wrYxm7B3i9rT1PSFPQ5Y+6 4k4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Ny1rS5Vlhy6/OKpPsNwZg69/0729VUzyGlQorqIyY/0r5U1SfZCaRsnj0rewDHQ1OwzdFLm5l16iJFA==
X-Received: by 10.200.33.210 with SMTP id 18mr37476708qtz.159.1491522193900; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.27.203 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1f550ddb-a279-ad2b-0599-c9ed2c95da09@nostrum.com>
References: <149142527327.21912.5654685591478038284@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnU7qXVeCDxoRbG8i6GbxJTA6gRpyHH0Yf+h0eRAJ+WLxw@mail.gmail.com> <1f550ddb-a279-ad2b-0599-c9ed2c95da09@nostrum.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:43:13 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVb+CZRnLMH-=so+XKFOGK+f2tWMZct5Yg2ADB6WepUQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_oSNiJ1uyTIkKyJru0JlWFuwFqY>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:43:17 -0000
On 7 April 2017 at 00:47, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: >> >> That said, I think that the counter thing can be removed. We require >> 128 bits of salt, which is a space that is large enough to select >> randomly from in perpetuity. > > That would be my personal preference. Sold. https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/8c31395609cdd2d1a91059fcbaa5a33fda622525
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ht… Robert Sparks
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Martin Thomson
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Robert Sparks
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Martin Thomson