[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Fri, 11 June 2010 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C0D3A6888; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.578
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.763, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHqHWNUSZuKN; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B9C3A67A7; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C11EB43.7040003@deployingradius.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:52:35 +0200
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@ietf.org, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition@tools.ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:52:34 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

  The document defines XML service registrations for enumservices.
There appear to be no security considerations with the document.