[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02
Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Fri, 28 February 2014 03:27 UTC
Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C451A039A; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SI2TeoLuA6rF; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x235.google.com (mail-yh0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A26B1A02C5; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v1so135888yhn.26 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mhtXIKm1v8PgHF4XsVGBf2HeiVveKqFEgbT5viWd6xs=; b=Hw9p1OStWuJnKP505DQ5NqR3i3q9R3gj7X/srueVV48kV9SjwkVQ1nkMsQ788qT0q2 QtEzgwqZ11XtLvuE8E6U7K5pDw8C5mtpF1okLGrEFUOfeJhmemg/Q442HEOeKxeEEPqw t4xE/7rBjy4QfATVSKoopOqve7P8qr1uFNlPoHy+wPL6YyIi5DmE+9+XJpS1kDfaCzlr woyrTJKb6IcOtkj8Z2XReERJK/uJz8bBXnN1f7xPkNIMfrKHxRFhVkNGXNbnMj3HNpnW Y+SQgjSMcmk7RLrMwlxiJQYCVng5+i4b+NBij9E6xMsvNkAQyvIEGyMAZUh9lXtuTp6t z2RQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.223.73 with SMTP id u69mr431828yhp.40.1393558058536; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.81.136 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:27:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CADajj4ZHUjPaDH1rpiO9H8C=At_rMO8sLQ1VXbmBQKCTB88fUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv@tool.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e016349a40d929d04f36f05fc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/aH21mBVE092xN26lz-Q016KFJYM
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:27:41 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document clarifies label advertising behavior for LDP speakers. As such, it does not add any new functionality to LDP and hence the Sec Cons section looks fully adequate to me. -- -- Magnus
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-app… Magnus Nyström