Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-giralt-schac-ns-05

Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com> Fri, 27 May 2011 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89550E0739; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sXHBD-I9lAX; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4EBE0697; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=clonvick@cisco.com; l=911; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1306456389; x=1307665989; h=date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references: mime-version; bh=UN+sfL20/RCMAOPNag0JwtzwrbqVjeeuRFA6msZ4C7Q=; b=el9jNrKvPJ88zD5DhMWKzZvPYydOjWDnt2vbYCxMnYenJUTeCvAWutpc 9QmpVLudxjI970NOgCXTrrQlKh47hyMF/MzVEvQUSKzC7QLzAUOYLLau6 qSOKxYR976h35sueh5A5murGhIVW63UhH7/KhNUw5NzJwMjw5pDedIgKa w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMHw3k2rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABUpjV4iHCfEp1fhhwEhmGZCA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,277,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="365158088"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2011 00:33:08 +0000
Received: from sjc-cde-032.cisco.com (sjc-cde-032.cisco.com [171.69.29.20]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4R0X80I002074; Fri, 27 May 2011 00:33:08 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-giralt-schac-ns.all@tools.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1105261629520.7427@sjc-cde-032.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1105261731210.7427@sjc-cde-032.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1105261629520.7427@sjc-cde-032.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-giralt-schac-ns-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 00:33:10 -0000

Bahh.. I keep forgetting to leave the "-NN" off of the .all@tools.ietf.org 
list.

Regards,
Chris

On Thu, 26 May 2011, Chris Lonvick wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> As Victoriano noted in his response to my last review, all issues that I 
> raised have been addressed.
>
> I am satisfied with the quality and integrity of this document and feel that 
> it is ready for publication.  :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>
>