[secdir] ADs and directorates
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 04 March 2013 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0372A21F8D1A for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:27:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B9eZMIq4yb5s for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145BB21F8D14 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CECBE70 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:26:32 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TCHrkne+I4g for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:26:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:4179:befb:7c4a:b956] (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:4179:befb:7c4a:b956]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32A80BE6F for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:26:32 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5134D949.4090206@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:26:33 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [secdir] ADs and directorates
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:27:00 -0000
Hi, I'm sure some of you are following the discussion on the IETF discuss list about the transport area and the difficulty in finding an AD for that. (Thread starts at [1]). Some people are asking things like "could directorates help reduce the time commitment of ADs" and of course secdir are the poster-child good directorate (thanks again!) so Sean and I would like to get your opinions about that, as it might relate to secdir, at the lunch next week. (Or via mail if you won't be there.) Just as an example, some people are suggesting that directorates might take on more of the AD role, so for secdir, do you think that's crazy, worth-a-look, a really good idea, or something else? We're not proposing to actually do anything right now, but it'd be good if Sean and I knew what you folks think about such suggestions as they relate to the security area. Your more general thoughts would of course also be useful, but are probably better sent to the IETF discussion list. Thanks, S. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77418.html
- Re: [secdir] ADs and directorates Moriarty, Kathleen
- [secdir] ADs and directorates Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] ADs and directorates Leif Johansson