Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12

"Card, Stu" <stu.card@axenterprize.com> Mon, 14 June 2021 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888B13A2669 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=axenterprize.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ll034gqM2Sls for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02B163A13AC for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id k7so17118325ejv.12 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axenterprize.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fgnbR9fbNBTUlDhnvP01Ll0ql1MbwRFpRrNWSWFFpDo=; b=dN9mjAzXapIX6ptiDdi+9B2ziYlTyk2jD1V15ky9F0E5MM3NUnts0UciQeYqsdO3W1 kwssUlFU5HBwzYhZkHCoek4n9wJZD4jMQunqVM+NaWo2vpq2NtZcI8Xv7Eyf+Wrgk+ln 30WKbIEc6Wh9Z5+uiirbAK2j2NPpTOSeqQ/s0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fgnbR9fbNBTUlDhnvP01Ll0ql1MbwRFpRrNWSWFFpDo=; b=qNWHKw9oV34Jj/5Et9CjuO2jq5dzOyfCReIUTOYkbC0Q7VehfNY2hXgZFH0NYtKvQv saMSctRZVisPDqgo4G6XY1OqP4CZiMc1hptkhipnt+TnlPGAjM+1vbTpXnHFIkf7He/C Hxa2kpGQCxcbWi2vJ8yXoJfnwrlNsc/rQQceLEbSq4FUVXKce2pgv6pbBU+cIzSsp8Az fN0i8x4RGVhUKO8umFNUmQvoIHSLKj01it/PitHfiFygl4OIWYIAI8A0dajJE29fo+5A 7HAdUDlWEVbis41TfGYzza9tuG6S7k1vkRO40q181z9Ru5n4v83sBIyGXBEczO8Mqqp+ Y+sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KOgZ9aq/6dFJ7x8wyJBDXBRnW5dDFVkmALEy3Tlk7gVnUhLgN 4MBsekHZaBfpTa3CVhOA+CJgPvoDldKUBlLrx5ZBhvyfZO1rQcSQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEt70VuDcdedCO70IZ2o1Zkc1xyES8Y9IBu4dt+KhOwM6ImVLj9thg5eEYKMsm4gY1W493zjPEaST7yFX3Txk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dfd1:: with SMTP id jt17mr15624231ejc.486.1623682099407; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162284607683.2810.922759741714671925@ietfa.amsl.com> <1fda7554-4396-e2be-6710-9d418d0f9171@axenterprize.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fda7554-4396-e2be-6710-9d418d0f9171@axenterprize.com>
From: "Card, Stu" <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:48:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKM0pYNYonOrtXFhXFoU6fq7EknVXkm=SwGntLCT99DNNaT9EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-drip-reqs.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tm-rid@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c383d005c4baf248"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/axALJHtc6K6yU1yp3uFN1v0QCCI>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:48:28 -0000

DRIP Requirements rev 13 has been posted.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-drip-reqs/
Thanks for your review, which I hope this rev adequately reflects.


On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:23 AM Stuart W. Card <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
wrote:

> Good catch: not that the issue has not been addressed, but that where
> (external to IETF) it has been addressed is neither cited nor explained
> in our requirements; those of us more involved in UAS know it was
> addressed elsewhere, so never thought even to mention it here, as we
> should. Thanks!
>
> I previously sent the above reply to a narrower distribution, but just
> learned proper form in this context is to Reply to All.
>
> On 6/4/2021 6:34 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote:
> > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> > Review result: Has Issues
> >
> > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> > Review result: Has Issues
> >
> > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing
> > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.
> >   Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
> any other
> >    last call comments.
> >
> > This document specifies the requirements for Drone Remote Identifiers.
> But it
> > doesn't specify any Authoritative agencies to manage the Remote IDs.
> Section
> > 1.2 states that the Remote IDs are "Self-reports".  Does it mean anyone
> who
> > buys or deploys drones will follow the naming requirements specified by
> this
> > document? How to enforce?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Linda Dunbar
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> Stuart W. Card, PhD, Principal Engineer
> AX Enterprize, LLC  www.axenterprize.com
> 4947 Commercial Drive, Yorkville NY 13495
>