Re: [secdir] secdir re-review of draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-06.txt

  Hi Juergen,

  I really apologize for missing this. I erroneously assumed this comment
was a duplicate of one I received from IANA and it obviously was not. -07
has been submitted. Please take a look and see whether it addresses your
comment. Again, sorry for the SNAFU.

  For the telechat: please use -07 and to all of you I, again, apologize
for the screw-up.

  regards,

  Dan.

On Mon, September 21, 2009 1:34 am, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> All my previous comments concerning draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-04.txt
> have been addressed, except perhaps this one:
>
> c) There are two places where IANA assigned values need to be filled
>    into the text; perhaps add more explicit RFC editor instructions so
>    the editor knows what to fill in for 'TBD1'.
>
> I assume the authors will check carefully during auth48 that correct
> updates have been made by the RFC editor once IANA has assigned a
> value.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>