Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01
Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Thu, 20 February 2014 23:38 UTC
Return-Path: <jhutz@cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FBC1A0342; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzbYN0oB2OFp; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu (smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.217.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8CC1A0304; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.2.193.239] (minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.193.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s1KNcA4w005565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:38:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1392939490.4395.116.camel@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Varun Singh <varun@comnet.tkk.fi>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:38:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <05FF2E57-25CB-42AE-BC01-C46BB6AB17C7@comnet.tkk.fi>
References: <1392885680.27604.21.camel@destiny.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <A11FD60C-02FA-4C6A-A037-F1970654D655@comnet.tkk.fi> <1392937412.4395.114.camel@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <05FF2E57-25CB-42AE-BC01-C46BB6AB17C7@comnet.tkk.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.202
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/bBY6LlOC2RTc6vwIzo96GNG4YmY
Cc: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric.all@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, jhutz@cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 23:38:23 -0000
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 01:26 +0200, Varun Singh wrote: > Late could mean congestion and the receiver is skipping these packets. > early may signify the jitter buffer is small and not capable of handling the packet > (or perhaps a route change and packets are arriving out of order). I don’t think that > in either case, the sender will increase the rate in response to a discard report. > > Or did I misunderstand ? Nope; that's where I was going, and your explanation makes sense to me. In which case, the text you proposed seems fine to me. -- Jeff
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-… Varun Singh
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-… Varun Singh
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-xrblock-… Jeffrey Hutzelman