Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 21 September 2015 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CCD1ACE15 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0NqGIAXbeAi for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-f182.google.com (mail-yk0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B631ACE06 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdz138 with SMTP id z138so29533071ykd.2 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Col85FjPA+4EEQG4q1afABKuVN3FBZ5hf9ul4o6EoCY=; b=SZYqVrih//UkMxhIz3D51spkjgRxdv3AVsyeGc4/2sMm6HfRu14qcAdW1dMhOa4GRO wmWnFPv0prgYy1myJ59EKgnPphiy8jLTQlVxb/lTcRPnwIv3uwOVGEdotTLuD5YXb0if MqqtF9gZCN1HORLHxVsYAATQdyU370bauOm6v9XrprUya2pRZHjMILQg2Rll1mMjjTYQ SJXL4iCUnnJhF5dW+Pmp/oPufAaVGgL09wZB8v389g6tWHXUnpdfNPW2tMvv8n33fNN5 KVU+ElgLbGjLqPIVGpZNnTmqOnAKfYucu7KDQNdOo8UyK8Ort5S6M2DlWbeE/2y6QjK6 LQHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSdZ3cvOIfYsVAHj0CzuPleb8KKkweSuJaTvA0ji9/AOAS1ofvaL8ptBlBMo6LVM2WJJbZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.133.144 with SMTP id z138mr17469338ykb.111.1442858292488; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.52.135 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D32CEC2B-40C8-439B-A807-6B01E02083ED@cisco.com>
References: <D32CEC2B-40C8-439B-A807-6B01E02083ED@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:58:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLFAX5=3gJAq3uonjOMrrvrFfd9QaDcJQ1kPkRkzqZvZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11397a96fc69870520459fca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/bgGo00gAA67cc9yBDIJe9LAgLn0>
Cc: "draft-housley-sow-author-statistics.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-housley-sow-author-statistics.all@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:58:16 -0000

I had not seen this draft until now, but I wanted to quickly insert myself
into the conversation to thank Jari again for having provided these tools
for so long.
I have found  them to be incredibly helpful - it's about the only way I
know what drafts I have active, and what I need to do next...

It will be great to have this in the datatracker if Jari cannot continue to
run it on Arkko.net


W
On Monday, September 21, 2015, Brian Weis (bew) <bew@cisco.com> wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft outlines requirements for a statement of work to provide
> statistics about RFCs, Internet-Drafts, and their authors. There are no
> particular security considerations to the statement of work. There are also
> no privacy considerations that I can see, insomuch that the results will
> formalize the existing tools that gather statistics, and the statistics are
> gathered from previously published documents.
>
> I consider this draft to be Ready to publish.
>
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf