Re: [secdir] Assignments

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Thu, 28 March 2013 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5711F21F8E6E for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT-t0auT5k8C for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC75521F8E54 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id qd14so10267450ieb.28 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4PyK/Ow1qiETQiVtReVoLrtf0hLQ8jzzZahW+7tkdXg=; b=IUyiznccMNcKqIKXIv570QzQe2RtEVKf7qdKjF5urrFjkUmfb2scIZiZ9cWmEvDaC7 82ZXgVHpvoWNGr7m/A5KAAOZl8oQdBVR5zoXngjmUxxc9VJI3YuM6B111D46MuBFkqWH 8TSM2FxPpSbdXYJr8epSQOW7b+mGgJUyXgZLNDKbF5BI29K4tbZBWIUJAUW7J5FFQ8qb e9TYAtTokH4M/+jnrtn+A6vDRPcVVXvSr1J4TyWsDiPcqNsmT911YCNxiSvPeb4tYvH8 pgnYJxvGkV4eIb7VC24hSrClj2qqdw/K7N38YXb7NFC+v5DpJWR6DFutA9GorLfQnIVy gCPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=4PyK/Ow1qiETQiVtReVoLrtf0hLQ8jzzZahW+7tkdXg=; b=c3LBgCTs/Z9SpvfAeMZbo5GANVEzpuvEtiCpPcqX9qXwmOj17MTsKsn6IbddsknfDo bkwQ8CzdeHJMF4ju6RiD67DP1N4FAaH5mKUppMM/acrKWpXsA/NzbPOysf+hRByrWV/Y AlkkIANeJ+eFccJzMRXL8ppczfUOY5+bbUiVb+djdWq6U7wPznPPFwKoicb1w7Q40YRu 14zkzrFMvaZKSFUPehGrODluEpRil11xp8XsFHc40McHsg+vNEX6F7J9OAjcuIkLnO5+ H2h108PFbAo7pilKWc1c6G2D09kyRiAFTsXa5MUr2AmWm8Ti8kV+H4p2smRpJx2c8cIC uDFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.136.130 with SMTP id qa2mr7195831igb.1.1364477913339; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.20.131 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20811.30076.686637.240917@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
References: <20811.30076.686637.240917@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:38:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SS7y7=z08UL-R9jrptVS30pKJ=d8jERwODCtnvX+8LZgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: secdir-secretary@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYoX5fz1tQnzFinXjHX2QlLfrc8MHxgqvLUCui4eigc0TshNTVZPraMnXzqMDSKMwcM0L3ORxko+s/C9oGsQ1+nfNflvZ7mtKa81Wrvzs7RxIAvi8574PeHo7E7Bl142z8CoIu30Md11pBvh0O9Ef1JA8z2IaS7I8acjl9VokvH3EV+9oM92c8EcuOn194fPHIZGZS
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Assignments
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:38:34 -0000

On 21 March 2013 21:02, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>; wrote:
> Ben Laurie               2013-03-29 draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-07

I just took a look at this, and whilst it looks safe enough, my lack
of detailed knowledge of IPv6 means I'm probably not a great reviewer
for it...