Re: [secdir] keeping an eye on BoFs...
Yoav Nir <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sun, 07 October 2012 14:44 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B821F86EF for <email@example.com>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([188.8.131.52]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VGtSzGeEy4qj for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [184.108.40.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB0921F86E5 for <email@example.com>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [220.127.116.11]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q97Ei6Us028262; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 16:44:07 +0200
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([18.104.22.168]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([22.214.171.124]) with mapi; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 16:44:06 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <email@example.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 16:44:06 +0200
Thread-Topic: [secdir] keeping an eye on BoFs...
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [secdir] keeping an eye on BoFs...
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:44:27 -0000
Hi Stephen, 4 of the BoFs this time are security-related (SACM, HTTPAUTH, WKOPS, and CERTRANS), so a lot of us are going to be in those. Of the rest, I plan to attend FMC and RFCFORM (but I hope there's not going to be a lot of security issues there). One that I think needs attention is IRS, because the use case draft ( http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-white-irs-use-case-00.html ) talks about deflecting attacks and because of the whole thing, where some external control plane is reading and writing state in a router. I can't attend that, because it conflicts with IPSECME, though. Yoav On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > There're a bunch of BoFs  approved for the next > IETF meeting and the first draft agenda is out.  > > Sean and I would be grateful if some of you would be > willing to sit in on a BoF or two and let us know what > you think, in particular if it looks like there're > tricky security issues that might arise. That could > be via mail or just as a hallway chat, nothing formal > needed but it'd be good to know that we have some > security-clue at each if we can. > > If you can do a bit of that, just send Sean and I a > note saying which you plan to attend. If agenda > changes or other events mean you don't make it that's > ok. > > Thanks, > Stephen. > >  https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki >  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/