Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Tue, 03 February 2009 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421AF3A69C1; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7743A6BCD; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.562, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SORTED_RECIPS=1.125]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XypZEaT-xXVN; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nutshell.tislabs.com (ns1.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BC3A69C1; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id n130sw3u020627; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:54:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nodnsquery(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAZ1aqsO; Mon, 2 Feb 09 19:54:58 -0500
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id A70E23F45D; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:52:42 -0500 (EST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, clonvick@cisco.com, dbrungard@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, rbradfor@cisco.com, secdir@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BE3E47886AC4459B871105680FF0218D@your029b8cecfe>
Message-Id: <20090203005242.A70E23F45D@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:52:42 -0500
From: sandy@tislabs.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

>The references would be to RFC 5440 and to 

RFC 5440 has not yet been issued, according to the rfc-editor pages.  I 
could not pick out an obvious candidate in the drafts on the queue that
might be about to become RFC 5440 and www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5440.txt
gets a object-not-found error.

Typo?

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir