Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 29 October 2012 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE2921F86DB; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t55ZaQ9Z5Yis; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB61221F86CD; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=616; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351539329; x=1352748929; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=68bv4AA84OkEBHVWYmWnFxOJ4L+ePDmmUWV6AqzMVb8=; b=dknM2LmXOxl7LFm6FpFUmJkVui4cQV9Uw6ZRqzVTiu1bDS0Y8wasvtew hmxhG6CUlZn53VyfjlVPwbN6j1A9rM4cIpyDjc2OG8W1dHILLJJgy8pIP BRTc0hFrPqETz1z8rT8seUZ7B6QeS2EXFcH3L6nz7N5CXoeGouUbVwhkw Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAAPajlCtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABEhVG9NYEIgh4BAQEDARIBJz8FCwIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQgah14GnAOfdot1hXxhA6RLgWuCb4IZ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,673,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="136589773"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2012 19:35:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9TJZTgG017328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:35:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.217]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:35:29 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Chris Lonvick (clonvick)" <clonvick@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNtgo4Zq7/gKOVZ0m2sHabpJFkjZfRANYA
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:35:28 +0000
Message-ID: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED320D501C1@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1210291211560.10140@sjc-xdm-114.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1210291211560.10140@sjc-xdm-114.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.115.53]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19318.004
x-tm-as-result: No--33.677700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <64C8D18A35FE40499ED644DDDD081AD3@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>, "<iesg@ietf.org>" <iesg@ietf.org>, "<secdir@ietf.org>" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:35:31 -0000

Thanks, Chris, for the time and the review!

-- Carlos.

On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> I didn't find any security related issues in this.
> It all looks good to me.  :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
>