IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 05 January 2015 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D961A0371 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKcIMu-abxX3 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp106.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp106.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD2F1A8725 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 864831804E5; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:08:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp22.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id D64FB180181; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:08:48 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [10.20.30.43] (pool-74-96-189-180.washdc.fios.verizon.net [74.96.189.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.4.2); Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:08:49 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <m28uhj2wxg.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:08:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <96B524C4-B2E8-443E-871D-60B5FCD2F44A@ogud.com>
References: <4E0F5009-4811-4FFE-AA26-ECFAC2398101@ogud.com> <m28uhj2wxg.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/eNKJozs-d_KDLhYe2-ngFB73cU4
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extension@tools.ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:09:00 -0000

> On Jan 3, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> The document contains no issues from a security perspective as it is
>> only creating LSA’s for new types of route selection metrics, time
>> instead of network hops.
> 
> and the new lsas could not be used in path shortening attacks, right?
> 
> randy
> 


Randy,
this document only defines the format of the LSA’s it does
not talk about processing by the routing engines. 

	Olafur

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email