[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-13
Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> Fri, 05 April 2019 06:25 UTC
Return-Path: <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363EC12031F; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 23:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9yVJvhXKPsct; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 23:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE2F120361; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 23:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,310,1549926000"; d="scan'208,217";a="377297880"
Received: from dom38-1-82-236-155-50.fbx.proxad.net (HELO [192.168.1.100]) ([82.236.155.50]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2019 08:25:08 +0200
From: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_640E2EED-E03C-4CA1-80A1-E886899E5E13"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Message-Id: <B918C708-61AB-4B1B-8EE7-BD72EFE79ADA@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 08:25:07 +0200
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.all@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ePafAP-r3WmCGv6og6Y-dBOzulk>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 06:25:35 -0000
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready Since my previous secdir review of the -12 version, the comments have all been addressed in a satisfying manner. Typo: ** Remove one « against » in sentence: "In order to protect against against…" Regards, Vincent
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pc… Vincent Roca