Re: [secdir] review of draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Thank you for the review!

Lou

On 8/27/2009 11:31 PM, Scott G. Kelly wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
>  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
> area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> The abstract does a good job of summarizing: This document describes how
> Resource ReserVation Protocol (RSVP) PathErr Messages may be used to
> trigger rerouting of Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
> Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) point-to-point Traffic Engineering (TE) Label
> Switched Paths (LSPs) without first removing LSP state or resources.
> 
> The security considerations section says the document introduces no new
> security considerations as it describes usage of existing formats and
> mechanisms, and I agree. It also points the reader to the security
> considerations sections of RFC4920 and RFC4736, and these do seem to do
> a reasonable job of summarizing.
> 
> I see no issues of concern for the security area ADs with this document.
> 
> --Scott
> 
> 
>