[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09

Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 05 July 2020 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25F53A0B3F; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 14:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uG_NPts2G701; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 14:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x741.google.com (mail-qk1-x741.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::741]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FCAF3A0B3E; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 14:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x741.google.com with SMTP id b4so33160142qkn.11; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=othb3mMLL+NO4LsiYNI/Ej0LwnXGhEw62jueKAi6BYg=; b=cWEqHozgTj+ohi3Ypuxmjtx9nwNFZ7iQX9nji7c6455/pzSfV2p9nYtyzXrwcaG3mD o+6jxQmFqGKbzvoixTojgTit1Nx9ONN0fC3LjtbHQiT0jK3hQLtjgmqpkcMld3tzMmNB o3F5ALsh9QQccdUxDWXdA4kTUNSG3Ujxx3pzNKKViTw/e0pFM8DcpU0IIZ+Azf+msCwH dOzp9e5e4KMnYcCHnYDnX8RoARoY7YcUmP69YGc/eYpo3fN/7D0VlOGbPeAWYImC4uXZ txaAG4pia+1r2b76Z4i5aIPeIyp1genpC7zhoTGq4ZArfkY/nKWCZCVkrLo140Miw6wb jM4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=othb3mMLL+NO4LsiYNI/Ej0LwnXGhEw62jueKAi6BYg=; b=Tv473h72DAKcfqIEr5voKpjVSDrKzxdd8VKdTEpucMtZoQU4Kf4RHy64ym+lLa58Rw 5xVCkMELZc2KuKYkV4CZo9AIdqgM6KJk7e29I+I4Ecow9v7CfUV5339FyJsOdgn0GFO2 zzu4wWaCxl5PbFISREMak6ZiXoBG8CVhbzKDIdYKdQZCKR9kWsjZN1i5OFd3nwxUhEpP 1xFkuNH7NzB61RPHTfBG04MjPNGGH0NRHTF2dn3H4VrpSWE46ZwVMohocMYqUHpJK9/d 10paIg6jRbhchKZqpk8D8vgYIlD4jK18Np1x3BKIFLe2qoaTDEc+e0cv1b/HYL6f7Kqv cYdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iyWIQFZn3FD3YsuysjZR26uujK2q8xqBMNgaTRGfBNLRVyhg8 vPG1QzVD9zu16uMD8od+VhaNoTbs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeMFtojxgTcqtCsM5doncTcoZgozpqVlwlF4LhObDFY6QTbrKyeC9p6ElPhPrTCl5ZFnycig==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b8a:: with SMTP id k10mr45387143qkh.32.1593985194465; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Chriss-Air.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:12b0:adf0:4c33:790a:3f99:cbb3]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm19058494qtc.17.2020.07.05.14.39.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.all@ietf.org
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fe0e1c5c-c43e-fdb2-c417-a678ba6cc927@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 16:39:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ezcik3UgvUl7HVNYqy7ScQIXrt0>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 21:39:57 -0000

Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the 
review is Ready.

The Security Considerations section is a bit light but adequate. It 
would be good if the authors could make a statement similar to that made 
in RFC 7432. Something like, "Security considerations discussed in 
[applicable RFCs] apply to this document. ... This section describes 
additional considerations."

Best regards,
Chris