[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-05
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 05 January 2011 22:39 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49AD3A6D0B; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:39:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGOrr2VwW6OW; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D753A6D02; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so7003060ywk.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:41:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Chbm4NgVrTi6OXsedbMpDPxnZPsFYC5eIiDl/A3a2Q8=; b=W5IdPm1NYX8OFmO4Vn2P8cdvZ6fcybO9GWSM0tF4fb3icAZWmlnapNA79UQJqf1tR4 Ny9mGWfk+4xLcWLIi1NbRWx8PI4rz2dvyiEsue2J5DAwlgCqSDNbM5N+VDUUGXZXo5/K kUV9iFf0LFXXlFdJXjOBm5P0L3esqHLU7AtL8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mGcOHaPU/bvOIpezh13SxjcjtEsQfT2XjlOxLd5e14RV/7uPo8YqZV5chAKEiNmAYr wDb+fWkZuOX/Y06fRCkwQ4yz55M4L3dgZ+iibnu4TV1U2241Y+VH1CKjAioWc+lGQWIL o+1aVHbPB43atWsNwOkvDmiYRkOawX8Lvidh8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.231.20 with SMTP id d20mr3186430anh.35.1294267311265; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.31.8 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:41:51 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimWH5wUkLqOF5HcK4pBkyrP=qQeyxdrWtz9J6tc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, karlheinz.wolf@nic.at, Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:39:45 -0000
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft proposes an experimental extension to the LoST protocol to add additional information to the data being exchanged. While the LoST protocol exchanges raise significant privacy and confidentiality concerns, it does not appear to me that the additional data proposed raises different or additional concerns. It is thus appropriate for this document to refer back to the original protocol document which in turn considers the privacy issues in considerable detail. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-s… Phillip Hallam-Baker