[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-27

Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818451A014E for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:01:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQ9EvMjq6EaC for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:01:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD481A004B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t1N71sBa011179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:01:55 GMT
Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1N71s8l017132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:01:54 GMT
Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1N71rrn011737; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:01:54 GMT
Received: from [10.159.86.55] (/10.159.86.55) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:01:48 -0800
Message-ID: <54EAD095.2000200@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:02:45 -0700
From: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/20150125 Thunderbird/17.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <54AA17B0.40500@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <54AA17B0.40500@oracle.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <54AA17B0.40500@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/f2oH0H3bPmUVHGfjsJOhpYWH-AY>
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-27
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:01:58 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.


The draft specifies an encoding scheme for information on a Wavelength Switched Optical Network
(WSON).  Specifically, information that is used for Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA).

The security considerations section does exist and discloses that the draft does not impose
any security considerations in itself, but does admit that documents that reference this draft
would have considerations for privacy, spoofing, and tampering of any associated data.  I agree
with this assertion.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

Usually the Abstract is the first section in the draft.
The abbreviations should have the expanded word with the corresponding capital letter.
GMPLS is not initially expanded in the Abstract section.
s/RB identifier./RB identifiers./

Shawn.
--