Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext

Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org> Mon, 18 April 2016 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler+ietf@watson.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E96D12D8B9; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 02:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-8OZbx-48CU; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 02:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C050E12D803; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 02:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E102946B35; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (weiler@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3I9mvmG010755; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:48:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler+ietf@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u3I9mvIi010751; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:48:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler+ietf@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:48:56 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>
X-X-Sender: weiler@fledge.watson.org
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5714A9D6.4010602@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604180544580.7567@fledge.watson.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604150753390.94067@fledge.watson.org> <5714A9D6.4010602@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/f7AUTm5TeePqLCFupU2xeuY99Hk>
Cc: draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext.all@ietf.org, "avtext@ietf.org" <avtext@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:49:01 -0000

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Magnus Westerlund wrote:

> And add RFC7201 as an informative reference.

That makes sense to me.

> Yes, this is a reasonable thing to consider. I suggest that we add the below 
> paragraph before the last paragraph in the Security Consideration. 
....

This is the right idea.  It would be good for someone else in the WG 
to weigh in on its correctness and completeness.  The proposed text 
needs minor editting, but that can wait for the RFC Editor, if needed.

> Does this addresses the editorial issue?

Yes, perfectly.

Thank you for the quick and receptive response.

-- Sam