Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 13:32 UTC
Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F242F12D1DC; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6EIeYRq3QOn; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705B712D1D5; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.34]) by mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u4VDWeZJ015499 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:40 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com u4VDWeZJ015499
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1464701561; bh=fKCcQ0OL/lhidh6VPb1ctk53AfY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=fTyTyQavw7QdSiCNGwtuGFAxTU2I1atShzWr+rAhaQ89F9dpuznddphSKLRKY2mZq FPCQFLZrVkNwATk/ejj/FPWWSesMokxHn0VNJPG6Umo8QJYGx1AeKNkSVSY+vJuZaT VdCZf5u3poN2eAPQnckyCHn0gfN9O0LFBRpoNXdY=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com u4VDWeZJ015499
Received: from mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.19]) by maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:17 -0400
Received: from MXHUB321.corp.emc.com (MXHUB321.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.99]) by mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u4VDWQsQ024565 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:26 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB321.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.99]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:26 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>, "lars@netapp.com" <lars@netapp.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
Thread-Index: AdG7IyLdVBROrcWPQpmXcgE5pcjURQAI6B+AAAGA3PA=
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:32:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F56189C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <009201d1bb24$1563e4e0$402baea0$@nict.go.jp> <009601d1bb25$3cb3dea0$b61b9be0$@nict.go.jp>
In-Reply-To: <009601d1bb25$3cb3dea0$b61b9be0$@nict.go.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.45.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/fOv00Tugy6CjPOuoReu2jHKS38k>
Cc: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:32:46 -0000
Take-san, Many thanks for this review - we'll re-check Table 1 and make any necessary corrections. Thanks, --David (as draft shepherd) > -----Original Message----- > From: Takeshi Takahashi [mailto:takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:15 AM > To: lars@netapp.com; iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-tsvwg- > rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13 > > Hi again, let me correct the following part of my previous email. > > > [New] > > "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports" corresponds to Section 5.1.1 > > > > and > > > > "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds > to Section 5.1.2 > > [New] > "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports" corresponds to Section 5.1.1 > > and > > "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to > Section 5.1 > > Thank you. > Take > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: secdir [mailto:secdir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Takeshi > > Takahashi > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 7:06 PM > > To: lars@netapp.com; iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org; > > draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org > > Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13 > > > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing > > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area > > directors. > > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any > > other last call comments. > > > > [General summary] > > > > This document is ready. > > > > [Topic of this draft] > > > > This draft talks about the UDP Usage Guidelines and replaces RFC 5405 > (BCP). > > It talks about how to use UDP, especially it pays attention to the fair > > use > > of the network resourced and talks a lot on congestion control. > > > > The RFC 5045 focuses on unicast case, but this bis document talks about > > multicast, (anycast, broadcast, )and IP tunneling cases. > > > > The content is useful, and I hope to see this draft to be published as an > > RFC. > > > > [Clarification question] > > > > In Table 1 "Summary of recommendations", I wonder if the corresponding > > section numbers are correct. > > > > [Now] > > "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports" corresponds to Section 5.1 > > and > > "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds > > to > > Section 5.2 > > > > [New] > > "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports" corresponds to Section 5.1.1 > > and > > "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds > > to > > Section 5.1.2 > > > > I might be wrong, so please check. > > > > Also I have seen several typos (especially, missing parentheses around > > referenced section numbers) on this document, so please revise the texts > > before the publication of this document. > > > > Thank you. > > Take > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > secdir mailing list > > secdir@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rf… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rf… Eggert, Lars
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc540… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rf… Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rf… Black, David