Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 22 August 2013 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6B11E811D for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjoIE7im7Yg2 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC5211E81FF for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7M4MhUe002466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:46 -0700
Message-ID: <521591FA.20601@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:18 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
References: <51CAA254.6040303@oracle.com> <52158CF5.4050001@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <52158CF5.4050001@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:22:17 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-repute-query-http.all@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:22:52 -0000

On 8/21/2013 9:00 PM, Shawn M Emery wrote:
> However, none of the
> referenced RFCs and draft directly talk about the various attacks and
> how to mitigate against said attacks.


Shawn, some clarification please:

    This is a simple query protocol, ableit yes one where the data is 
making trust assertions.

    A possible implication of your above comment is that all IETF 
protocols should carry a threat analysis.  Have I misunderstood?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net