Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 24 October 2014 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F101A00E1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LVZ2L6pZ4gKp; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF941A010E; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id gf13so2939887lab.15 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nMjLKd7Fv/5Sbc8Cpuwk3m5FK8YiEBbWSibIc8KwpK8=; b=VbvYGvg8VkWCkvPVTd0XQNXFA/ZmaCrEqDgxU0dKMBspjLczjnnSaHhm/N+CSKzKnX pgzy+hN67+vysQQSKxDHCo9v2JhFyGsqXF7iSVv5sc/OkJRFphcjEd+NvekA93gDPG1p eH3VWoaPFnpM5tQ7ebFI89lFbWJyyU5+J0Bq9iuT3dToGr6DaZJg5UPaoRKZHYfHA3nb RD5Y4ZbFSKnt4LbS/ltGhs4dC9X5aXjMpiu5AgPTnbVsxhPHCtNltj/nz16X0kp/rg/o OLhObi9Ba3Pob4MODKCq8PMsFo9SbPsHeyz+kU57Xt830dX5pnpBJfYB1Qxg9DGGfq3c jv/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.162.73 with SMTP id xy9mr2867679lbb.94.1414156904865; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.8.103 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9STJ5HjeXdnwjptPatjTOzztdeq9Su7Cq5uE4=RjVDJ00Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABrd9STJ5HjeXdnwjptPatjTOzztdeq9Su7Cq5uE4=RjVDJ00Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:21:44 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uzYqdv-KK0YKeTB8RQL21OylJyg
Message-ID: <CALaySJLm9TMEC0_hGW3=G04q1gVOfCuoEOgM9yJ_6F5a4VyoVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/fd5BqW7mbN6Y7zMLO18hn6SwUlI
Cc: draft-murdock-nato-nid.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:22:48 -0000

Thanks for the review, Ben.

>> "Distribution of NATO information in any form is subject to its
>> security policies. Nonetheless, this specification is for public
>> use and not subject to any NATO security policies."
>
> Which seems to involve some magical thinking (how do those
> security policies magically follow the information?)

Similarly, how does copyright magically follow any publication?  To
the extent, I guess, that there's legal recourse, and/or that people
are dissuaded from violating the policies by the threat or the
reminder.

Barry