Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Sun, 28 July 2013 13:54 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2300A21F940D for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 06:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHX9Z3ckKWsm for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C42821F92E7 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:37667 helo=fritz.local) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1V3RQL-0000TO-B1; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:54:13 -0400
Message-ID: <51F52283.2070306@bbn.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:54:11 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, thomas.beckhaus@telekom.de, bruno.decraene@orange.com, kishoret@juniper.net, maciek@cisco.com, lmartini@cisco.com, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, loa@pi.nu, rcallon@juniper.net, swallow@cisco.com
References: <5199879B.5010701@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <5199879B.5010701@bbn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040100000308030806090408"
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:54:26 -0000
I re-reviewed this documentas part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. I compared the -08 and -09 version of this document, using the IETF diff tool. The authors responded to my concern that there were many instances of what appeared to be normative text in Sections 3 and 4, yet almost all instances of the words "must" and "should" were lowercase. They removed all of the words in question. I'm surprised by this outcome, but if the WG chairs and ADs believe the resulting text is correct, with NO normative terms, so be it. The authors also revised the Security Considerations (Section 7) text, addressing all of my comments.
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod… Stephen Kent
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp… Stephen Kent