Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BBE21F8D1C; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjV3wGuTjSKO; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A70C21F8D14; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3BB27BC056; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=ZimHsvHYRfFbFV8Ovqco Egeb7ZM=; b=mVN5YBUMoc9xNTTMOwwlNiHYLaXgVDDHntKZAvzWk7iKH+c+hww6 u7FRwN+l2I04b1HwwqprioJBDDYHx6lgzimoJSMGxkiCPBnJER+Bg3yRC8rGrFFf 2RE3TWAzk/r7XgHoj3brkbu6zTxTeLMB9iamiUK9+5tZ8q+BDe4TvMA=
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF79327BC075; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d46so2235529wer.30 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.158.161 with SMTP id wv1mr10890652wjb.38.1365093681860; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.105.195 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOidT3dX6DiD54sVFYON0ROKF6J1TeGsntxj2XGe5txWnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130319142244.19905.39903.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1303312327530.9389@multics.mit.edu> <CAK3OfOidT3dX6DiD54sVFYON0ROKF6J1TeGsntxj2XGe5txWnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:41:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOjrWi+4sLGcnBcgCHnNMFK=90cuBS-1Q8bt=Q48GKozCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:41:29 -0000

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> Oh, well, this is just outdated text.  And indeed, the GSS-API's
> notion of "qop" (quality of protection) is broken: it's used in the
> wrong place (per-msg token functions).  The GSS qop brokenness is why
> this text persists.
>
> OLD:
...
> NEW:
...

Actually, I should also propose some text explaining why qop is a
busted concept and what qop 0 means ("default").

Nico
--