IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Discussion from the Security Directorate

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Wed, 29 July 2009 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhutz@cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D41E3A6909 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SrcMv5O7Mt7V for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.srv.cs.cmu.edu (SMTP02.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.217.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABF63A6B6C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ATLANTIS.PC.CS.CMU.EDU (SIRIUS.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.216.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp02.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n6TFticp007881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:55:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:55:44 -0400
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Tina <tena@huawei.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7A7BC0A59F89445F9C385328@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <10275_1248881187_n6TFQQhM022941_50F560B9-787C-4B90-903B-28F27E67CF85@huawei.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04018CF83B@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <B40EE4C2-93AE-45A3-89AA-8601BFC76346@huawei.com> <633E561F-48D1-42DE-A310-9E77DB0A87F1@cisco.com> <4A6D98AC.4060100@bogus.com> <5AECC74E-90A0-45DA-9D23-7DE64F3488CB@cisco.com> <04f701ca102f$3e6d2c90$7958404e@china.huawei.com> <4C4D74B8-10FA-458E-93E4-37EE48F9D386@cisco.com> <10275_1248881187_n6TFQQhM022941_50F560B9-787C-4B90-903B-28F27E67CF85@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.197
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>, 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Softwire Chairs <softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, v6ops-ads@tools.ietf.org, softwire-ads@tools.ietf.org, behave-ads@tools.ietf.org, Behave Chairs <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Discussion from the Security Directorate
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:56:43 -0000

--On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 05:23:53 PM +0200 Tina <tena@huawei.com> 
wrote:

> Hi Fred and David,
> The slides were sent to OPS ADs, and we discussed it a bit in OPS-DIR
> work lunch on Monday. According to the suggestion from Dan, I forwarded
> the slides to the WG chairs of v6ops and opsec.

Who sent them to the OPS AD's?  This is the first I've heard of this, and 
certainly others on the security directorate seem to be in the same boat. 
Some context would be nice...

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email