[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 15 July 2019 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE322120104; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 02:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-yang.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Message-ID: <156318424257.27269.7466334573453292957@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 02:50:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/h94M4V3CBrQXuFDdreOLatw4a9g>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:50:43 -0000

Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Has Nits

This document seems to have a reasonable security considerations section.

As a nit, I notice that the abbreviation OSPF is not written out or explained
at all in this document. One should hope that most people that find their way
to this document are familiar with OSPF, but I still believe that is is
appropriate for all IETF RFC to write out and briefly explain/reference
abbreviations.

In summary this document seems well written