Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-06 publication requested

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 24 December 2009 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8373A69B1 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yNFMJD7hFdD for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AA33A6818 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAH7nMktAZnwM/2dsb2JhbAC+I5Y4hDMEjTU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,448,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="76443039"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2009 12:03:16 +0000
Received: from bxb-rdroms-8717.cisco.com (bxb-rdroms-8717.cisco.com [10.98.10.88]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBOC3FOG015405; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:03:15 GMT
Message-Id: <45766AF2-50A0-4770-BBF5-E6E29B3C4C9D@cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: secdir-secretary@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912230827420.78742@fledge.watson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:03:16 -0500
References: <6631C820-4234-4E20-8A34-05A2046E2EA4@cisco.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912230827420.78742@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-06 publication requested
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:03:37 -0000

Sam - thanks for arranging for the review.

I wanted to give you and the secdir list a little extra warning for  
this particular draft.

- Ralph

On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:31 PM 12/23/09, Samuel Weiler wrote:

> FYI, to all:
>
> I normally assign these special requests as part of the ordinary  
> rotation, whether they come to the secdir list, secdir-secretary@mit.edu 
> , or some other address.  In this particular case, I've gotten three  
> volunteers for reviewing this doc.  This doc will get adequate  
> coverage, methinks.
>
> And to Ralph:
>
> I normally assign secdir reviews within about a week of the last  
> call being requested (even if it hasn't gone out yet).  Unless you  
> need something even earlier, a special request isn't needed.
>
> -- Sam
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Ralph Droms wrote:
>
>> The dnsext WG has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec- 
>> gost-06. I expect to start an IETF last call of the document soon.   
>> Please start a secdir review  of the draft and thanks...
>>
>> - Ralph
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> secdir mailing list
>> secdir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>>