[secdir] Secdir Review of draft-housley-rfc5008bis-00
Joe Salowey <jsalowey@cisco.com> Mon, 11 April 2011 22:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jsalowey@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC521E0669; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECp6YbIC4AiZ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B27E0668; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jsalowey@cisco.com; l=562; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302560066; x=1303769666; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: to:mime-version; bh=z/Xij4/EssG/7/vhfpzyK0h3KlAfMofggk9vV1ZFNCE=; b=hc/lWnclqDw2JO0IDQ4Dug3qFlFb2SFhG99kR5kwJLmh+tqI1Q9m/niF K3hC142awoE1U0U7VFLYJ5j44CvFINqsWxazEfYkgS4acHsRFIE1LnA/g ibzjr7zVhf+kWJf6fC777SuKn7HDFvjtzaBUzPjAnNsGImikyGb0gYQDo Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABdto02tJXG//2dsb2JhbACmH3embpxIhW4EhVuHfYNq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,193,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="427771452"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2011 21:07:07 +0000
Received: from [10.0.0.9] (rtp-vpn4-1596.cisco.com [10.82.214.60]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BL75gL017961; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:07:06 GMT
From: Joe Salowey <jsalowey@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:08:52 -0700
Message-Id: <54B38DE0-95DA-4949-B19A-3F4964481E49@cisco.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-housley-rfc5008bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-housley-rfc5008bis-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:14:28 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. draft-housley-rfc5008bis-00 obsoletes RFC 5008 which defines suite B algorithms for use in S/MIME. I don't see any issues with the contents of the document or the security considerations section.