Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 03 February 2009 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50FF3A6991; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:34:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDE33A6824; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:34:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.780, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqfQG2a-kzOH; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1333A6991; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:34:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n139XGBe016962; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:33:16 GMT
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n139XE1s016938; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:33:15 GMT
Message-ID: <EEBECECF9E47491AA545233613130422@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>, "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, iesg@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, "Bradford, Richard" <rbradfor@cisco.com>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, Bradford@tislabs.com, Brungard@tislabs.com, Chris@tislabs.com, Deborah@tislabs.com, Lonvick@tislabs.com, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, Rich@tislabs.com, Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
References: <20090203013434.3D7E53F483@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:33:12 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,
Yeah, 5440 is draft-ietf-pce-pcep-19.txt.
It is way ahead in the RFC Editor queue. Maybe less than a week from 
publication.
See it at http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc5440.txt

A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sandy Murphy" <sandy@tislabs.com>
To: <clonvick@cisco.com>; <dbrungard@att.com>; <iesg@ietf.org>; 
<jpv@cisco.com>; <rbradfor@cisco.com>; <secdir@ietf.org>; <@tislabs.com>; 
<adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <Bradford@tislabs.com>; <Brungard@tislabs.com>; 
<Chris@tislabs.com>; <Deborah@tislabs.com>; <Lonvick@tislabs.com>; 
<rcallon@juniper.net>; <Rich@tislabs.com>; <sandy@tislabs.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 AM
Subject: RE: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03


> >Where you see "RFC5440", assume that this refers to
>>"draft-ietf-pce-pcep-19.txt". The RFC editor will have no trouble making
>>the connection, and RFC5440 is exceptionally likely to be published
>>before this document gets to the RFC editor.=20
>
> This is about what I expected (and why I went searching the rfc editor
> queue).
>
> But what I was curious about was what the reference said, not its
> publication status.
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> --Sandy
> 

_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir