Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 21 September 2015 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A061ACE94; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEulNzry9cZ7; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92351ACED5; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC85F24143; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chWIlniXOiTB; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40599F2412F; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:05:16 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-347-713037693
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLFAX5=3gJAq3uonjOMrrvrFfd9QaDcJQ1kPkRkzqZvZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:05:05 -0400
Message-Id: <1EBBE254-6774-41F9-BD35-E1120B67FCC4@vigilsec.com>
References: <D32CEC2B-40C8-439B-A807-6B01E02083ED@cisco.com> <CAHw9_iLFAX5=3gJAq3uonjOMrrvrFfd9QaDcJQ1kPkRkzqZvZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hkJNDHsNbxuppd96Yqtx4nRBn80>
Cc: "draft-housley-sow-author-statistics.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-housley-sow-author-statistics.all@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:05:56 -0000

Warren:

As it says in the document, Jari has promised to include the appropriate redirects.

Russ


On Sep 21, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:

> I had not seen this draft until now, but I wanted to quickly insert myself into the conversation to thank Jari again for having provided these tools for so long. 
> I have found  them to be incredibly helpful - it's about the only way I know what drafts I have active, and what I need to do next...
> 
> It will be great to have this in the datatracker if Jari cannot continue to run it on Arkko.net
> 
> 
> W
> On Monday, September 21, 2015, Brian Weis (bew) <bew@cisco.com> wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> This draft outlines requirements for a statement of work to provide statistics about RFCs, Internet-Drafts, and their authors. There are no particular security considerations to the statement of work. There are also no privacy considerations that I can see, insomuch that the results will formalize the existing tools that gather statistics, and the statistics are gathered from previously published documents.
> 
> I consider this draft to be Ready to publish.
> 
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
>    ---maf