[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 21 February 2020 10:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD68A1200DF; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 02:29:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-kuehlewind-system-ports.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.118.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <158228099071.29085.17375165161369723615@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 02:29:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/iCl9X9CoE-BOsU2VebhzYrngppw>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:29:51 -0000
Reviewer: Mališa Vučinić Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document requests the reassignment of well-known ports in the IANA Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry from individuals or companies who have registered the port for use before RFC6335 was published to the IESG. The document is well written. It does not change the use of the ports, and so does not raise new security considerations, which is clearly described in the Security Considerations section. As such, the document is ready.
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-kuehlew… Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker