Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy.
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 28 January 2013 21:02 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E68E21F8763 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S+V4-R7MP7Wi for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD6E21F86E4 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1A2BE62; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:02:29 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmnXMtUb11Pb; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:02:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.44.73.174]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 496B1BE35; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:02:27 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5106E763.6020306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:02:27 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <C9F001FD-1F18-4789-89E7-07A31BA9A922@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <C9F001FD-1F18-4789-89E7-07A31BA9A922@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy.
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:02:55 -0000
Hi Olaf, I think Hannes' answer was right, and there are more security related BCPs (e.g. BCP107). Would it help to make a list or can you just say there's a bunch of those and here're some examples? If the former we can get you a longer list I guess;-) And I've a question back to you: might it be useful to have some kind of engagement between the IETF security area and ENISA and would that be something to bring up in this context? If a very light form of that was useful we'd be happy to invite some ENISA person(s) to come to a secdir lunch or give a talk at a saag session whenever. (Note: I don't mean from some known IETFer who's done stuff with ENISA but rather someone from ENISA who's not been to an IETF but might usefully inhale our fumes;-) S. On 01/28/2013 12:42 PM, Olaf Kolkman wrote: > > Folk, > > This mail is FYI, it may be of business/personal interest to some of you. > I have a specific question. > > Context: MSP for ICT St. > > You may or may not be aware that the EU has a Multi Stakeholder Platform for ICT > standardization. One of the stakeholders at the table is the IETF/IAB and your > truly is, with Hannes Tschofenig as backup, the representative for the IETF/IAB. > > The platform is chartered to give the Commission advise on all matters standard > and to identify standards, developed by fora and consortia, that can be used in > public procurement (formally RFCs can not be reference in EU procurement: when > these folk talk about standards they think ISO, ITU, ETSI etc etc.) > > > Specific: EU Cyber Sec Strat. > > What is attached is part on the advise on all matters standard aspect. The > document gives a short executive level overview of what the EU intends with its > cyber security strategy. The document is FYI mainly. > > However I have one particular bit of information that I need. See the section on > "Where do standards come in". I do not think there is any relevant IETF work in > this area (info exchange and such) and would like to get guidance if that is a > misunderstanding. > > > The platform is having its 3rd meeting 7 Feb. > > > > > > > *NLnet > *Labs > > Olaf M. Kolkman > > > www.NLnetLabs.nl <http://www.NLnetLabs.nl> > olaf@NLnetLabs.nl <mailto:olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> > > > Science Park 400, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > secdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview >
- [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Moriarty, Kathleen
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] EU Cyber Security Strategy. Tobias Gondrom