Re: [secdir] What and who is SecDir?

Tobias Gondrom <> Sat, 16 April 2011 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A102E06EF for <>; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.375
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQmD7CjZiC2I for <>; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAA7E0681 for <>; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default;; b=DDrhFxhszeTheCvAjicYd3SgK3NUcSoe8ARDN7Cz9J6GtWz2drIv1Qkz+GwwcINRKygg5bjWqQo3iFIeoOWu07NivMm1DZlqOzPwi4Q0c8SaMLXcRl0U/JH5pDxujOlh; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Received: (qmail 21689 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2011 20:22:25 +0200
Received: from (HELO seraphim.heaven) ( by with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Apr 2011 20:22:25 +0200
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:22:58 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [secdir] What and who is SecDir?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:22:56 -0000

On 04/15/2011 02:32 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Over in the "secdir review of draft-kuegler-ipsecme-pace-ikev2"
> thread, Paul and Nico had this exchange, which I don't want to see
> lost in that thread that not everyone will be reading:
> Nico:
>>>> "We", secdir, are volunteers.  This volunteer would rather avoid wheel
>>>> reinvention, and this volunteer, perhaps naively, had hoped others
>>>> would agree.  Perhaps other volunteers disagree (you do).  I
>>>> explicitly referred to secdir, not WG chairs, not ADs, nor did I refer
>>>> to actual current practice, but rather stated an opinion of what we
>>>> ought to do.
> Paul:
>>> Most people on secdir are here because they are chairs of WGs in the Security
>>> Area. Maybe you are thinking of the old secdir model. :-)
> Nico:
>> Perhaps I don't belong here any longer then?  And yes, I'm thinking of
>> the old secdir model.  When was it abandoned?  (We both seem to be out
>> of date then regarding secdir practices!)
> As I see it -- and the ADs can chime in if they see it differently --
> Nico and Paul are both right.  We are volunteers who want to see
> security issues in IETF protocols brought up and discussed, and who
> are willing to help do that through reviews and discussion.  The group
> is seeded with the chairs from the sec-area WGs, but it doesn't
> comprise those chairs exclusively.  And I, at least, wouldn't like it
> to.
Big +1. ;-)
And thank you for mentioning this on the secdir list.
And loved the film. ;-)


> For my part, I certainly think, Nico, that you do still belong here.
> I'd hate to see people leave this directorate just because they no
> longer chair any sec-area WGs.  That we don't always agree, as a
> group, and that there are sometimes arguments about the
> appropriateness of one reviewers comments, from the point of view of
> another, is only natural.  If those disagreements lead to interesting,
> useful discussions (even if they briefly become "arguments", and
> sometimes get a bit heated), that's all the better.  No part of the
> IETF is strife-free.  Just so long as we leave the twibills back in
> the armory.
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list