[secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06
Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com> Sat, 08 June 2024 03:28 UTC
Return-Path: <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF34C14F73E; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icp54WNAuRuL; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A5FC14F71B; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-374b05c4f40so12530615ab.3; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717817327; x=1718422127; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=I3/W0GzvQtbMjMBIl5ZXfLbzz3uW5VnJ6h6NQnIKjxs=; b=ZwjSPBHrzjjaHgY5t9mEXpXS8YagyrU3ZgPbknwBUYblyUKS8ESGaXQCh5mcydLLWB SZMsw4XBcujpu1ikSuLhIqgRsL0B5alqjcdxw/eIzg09+8fxFTJYr3rIU45Jqa41EN0X IDhQSyl62QNCfTcf9xD5C5pLh8y1C+KzL+ZplK6I503Yp79YhtZ1UFYVzTq1Aipt4ZhQ Qae1Papyrg49d3xxaXXaS3UCEXFycyn5Za1cG911ajaYgtKdKiiVtwDXCPfi0QQQ5MTE CYn4QgcF1+XRHulVQW2nlbXsyDuI/0kZjTXueBnzdO8+syePkfwDheAx5D7dl1rzMMgT Z0fQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717817327; x=1718422127; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=I3/W0GzvQtbMjMBIl5ZXfLbzz3uW5VnJ6h6NQnIKjxs=; b=C0sE7ZuaPkj1r3E8vNSKL9+EyeoqNA5zve0v9Qw8/iXME5DbN3Lc/MDO/xFd+M8Z/V 9TUjwGl+R4EsQ2HpJNyh+amzw2jbPWY0/tjy3nX652JfKtW8Aug8zOltyPec3jQaGnAx dV8Ljoi7dkgduwyfjPl8sVrNbb4VQ2C3e0H9uapC/eO3EHcq7B86p8ozIva7bT5oSHBy OAgfOPTmI5suJ4u5LA+Osb9ilA+AJ2WedWH6bbWwr+tilLmOF4xezNvHA4+9iIyD6Odu 2FzEtz2mwCeAn1Yzo4vB1xMI1QgvTpSM8hZJqjRzbNeuoukUgLbrLxQB8sMadnH2eAAj jsFQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjpjRmlThPySJ1Cfkx+KYdh6anTdnsyLwO/IF0BAh/0ns0a6f8HJj1UCAchd5HmQnjR2PZIust5FuZTM+CkJcXDgdtA/C6EYGZyWVnGy/uYF8BmqeTTQ0VR9jw/iYuI8nNgStqod3sUWVyEUDlSAt7RrpCvYnmdVoFVGi4k0t7n8Zam9x9eq8ylNdUXaLF
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9N6S6sXp54PLzQ2DSlGUsLexBNXfUIcOGQ2hSVaxxD4JAT2Nx XPb7gPBXUXWKIK+Xb3zEzSFzWU+TvrYczEisejnMMM4tWqcuflQw7oEBYg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG98v/zIX6MtRpCGq9XN8+OoAlKkDargbUcYYCYZ0sqGsoiCUwElLaNyJwO4QIpTlIl/zEfQg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:13ad:b0:375:938a:ecd5 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-375938aeedcmr14201515ab.12.1717817326677; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2601:284:8300:14a0:6114:e521:9ea6:6a61? ([2601:284:8300:14a0:6114:e521:9ea6:6a61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8926c6da1cb9f-4b7a221244dsm1186134173.28.2024.06.07.20.28.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------qlKmkbFpE2S3UclPNE0ayZ2Y"
Message-ID: <4ad14c31-deb1-44f2-829a-693e1e6b7460@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 21:29:44 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
References: <171765694296.11836.1686812500783472443@ietfa.amsl.com> <708F130C-9ADE-40AA-AE1F-CD61F0C8FDB2@verisign.com> <89871798-2bc5-4b6b-b490-e8f0ce3115de@gmail.com> <D858C50E-54E5-4E1D-BA86-6C0A5E529BDD@strayalpha.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D858C50E-54E5-4E1D-BA86-6C0A5E529BDD@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID-Hash: MPOEB63N3SXQ5XK6WUEI445N6AZVIUXS
X-Message-ID-Hash: MPOEB63N3SXQ5XK6WUEI445N6AZVIUXS
X-MailFrom: shawn.emery@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/iPt7neWbLX49e6hEDpN66D_NDgE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Joe, Thank you for clarifying. I'm in agreement with current text then: unsigned decimal integer Shawn. -- On 6/7/24 9:04 PM, touch@strayalpha.com wrote: > Hi, all, > >> On Jun 7, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 6/6/24 1:53 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote: >>> Hi Shawn, >>> >>> Thank you for the review and comments. >>> >>> We’ve fixed the editorial comments you identified. >>> >>> Regarding “decimal integer” — we use that phrase only when >>> describing the >>> presentation format (versus, say, hexadecimal) so we think it is >>> appropriate. >>> >>> However, we would defer to the advice or suggestion of the RFC editor or >>> other experts on this, if they have an opinion. >> >> My first intuition was that a decimal is an integer with a fractional >> component. However, precedence in this area has more credence than >> my intuition ;) > > Decimal refers to the base-10 number system, i.e., integer powers of > 10 (both positive, zero, and negative). Octal is the same for base 8; > hexadecimal for base 10. All can be integer or floating point. > > Base number systems use a separator called a “radix point” to indicate > the boundary between non-negative and negative powers. When the radix > point is used in the decimal system, it is called the decimal point. > IMO that can be considered a contraction of “decimal radix point”. > > Finally, integers don’t have fractional parts. Floating point numbers > do, though. > > Joe > > > > >
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dn… Shawn Emery via Datatracker
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Wessels, Duane
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Shawn Emery
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … touch@strayalpha.com
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Shawn Emery